Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1970, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in North Carolina v. Alford that has since allowed defendants who do not wish to risk their fates at trial to plead guilty while simultaneously asserting their innocence. Although "Alford pleas" have remained unexamined by researchers, the increasing number of identified wrongful convictions of those factually innocent highlights the need for an in-depth examination of them. In the present study, using the Department of Justice 2004 State Survey of Inmates in Correctional Facilities dataset, we examined the likelihood of entering Alford pleas over traditional guilty, no contest, and not guilty pleas for those convicted of murder/manslaughter. Although we generally found few differences between the three guilty plea types, interesting differences between Alford and not guilty pleas emerged. Implications for actual innocence are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Ethical-Legal Requirements of the Police Regarding the Principle of Innocence in Drug Crimes in the Light of Criminal Psychology
Background: Nowadays, drug crimes have been recognized as one of the criminal acts whose effects generally affect the community, so in order to have a fair trial, the principle of innocence was considered in the process of investigating drug crimes. Given the rule of ethics over the law and their two-way relationship, it is necessary to have special requirements governing the institution of cri...
متن کاملPleas without Bargaining: Guilty Pleas in the Felony Courts of Illinois, Michigan and Pennsylvania
outlines of two very different conceptions of the guilty plea process in answering the question: What makes the plea system work? While most observers agree some form of trial penalty exists to encourage pleas (i.e., a more severe sentence will be given to defendants who are convicted after trial), they differ over how pleas are put together. These differences form the basis for two competing m...
متن کاملمروری بر مبانی مسؤولیت پزشک از دیدگاه فقهای شیعه با تأمل بر اصل برائت
Presumption of innocence is one of the fundamental principles of criminal law that has its roots in moral and religious principles. Presumption of innocence is consistent with human nature, and special attention has been paid to it in Islam. For this reason it has been included in our constitutional law as well as in the constitutions and ordinary laws of other nations, and this indicates its s...
متن کاملExploring treatment options for rotator cuff disorders
Successful management of rotator cuff disorders requires a diagnostic and treatment algorithm that takes comorbidities into consideration. Within a framework of the patient’s age, the tear size, the injury mechanism, chronicity, and muscle atrophy/fatty infiltration, the overall risk of irreversible changes to the cuff with continued nonoperative treatment is weighed against the potential for i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Behavioral sciences & the law
دوره 27 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009